Remember, things are never as bad as they seem. Honestly! Good luck and all that! Remember, things are never as bad as they seem. Honestly! Good luck and all that!

resources for readers

this page is for anyone curious about DID depiction, critical analysis around DID depiction, and/or what avenues for interpretation can exist when dissecting depictions of DID.

i use this page to store my analytical essays and critical commentaries in response to various DID depictions across media and social spaces.

note: if you're on mobile, google docs may struggle with formatting and images. i recommend opening the gdocs app or using desktop if possible.

disclaimer / note to readers:

it is my goal to make discussion of what DID is, and criticism of how it is depicted, open and accessible to everybody.

when destigmatising an often sensationalised condition like DID, i think a key, unrecognised step is the demystification and humanisation of the experience. therefore, i want to encourage people to be comfortable understanding and engaging in open dialogue about DID, including how it is portrayed and spoken about. i believe making the topic less exclusive and jargon-esque is vital for a wider critical understanding that combats social stigma, and encourages progressive, humanising research and resources to be made for those who suffer from it.

therefore, using accessible language is very important to me and my work.

if any of my essays are hard to follow, or if i accidentally use specialised terminology that excludes those unfamiliar with medical jargon, please let me know and i will remedy it and clarify my meaning.

please also bear in mind i am a constantly growing person, who is constantly developing his knowledge, observations, and opinions; all opinions on specific depictions and media are my own at a given point in time. i am always open to being disagreed with and considering new viewpoints, and nothing i say here is free from improvement.

thank you for reading this foreword, and enjoy your reading!

milgram analysis: how mikoto introjects and conforms himself to social misconceptions around DID

summary:

analysing mikoto's social vulnerabilities, how Milgram frames DID to characters and audience, and following how mikoto's sense of self and symptom presentation develops in response to Milgram and the DID label.

read here (10.6k words)

Published: 01/07/2025, Edited: 07/07/2025, Media: Mikoto Kayano, MILGRAM Project. Notes: Informal.

milgram analysis: the orekoto (オレ) of Neoplasm is not the orekoto (俺) of John Doe

summary:

further analysing how mikoto's dissociative character functions, how his DID seems to operate, and why he and his condition may present itself the way that it does.

read here (5.2k words)

Published: 25/05/2025, Edited: 25/05/2025, Media: Mikoto Kayano, MILGRAM Project. Notes: Informal.

milgram analysis: 'john' (orekoto, オレ) did not form to vent mikoto's stress through murder, and he is not the alter that 'did it'

summary:

analysing and criticising mikoto's typical reception and arguing for a new interpretation of his behaviour and DID presentation.

read here (3.5k words)

Published: 22/04/2025, Edited: 22/04/2025, Media: Mikoto Kayano, MILGRAM Project. Notes: Informal.